Your Guide to Right-to-Work Bills (And How our Local Lawmakers Voted)
Legislation passed last week in the Michigan House and Senate could reach Gov. Rick Snyder for his signature by Tuesday. Leave a comment or upload a photo if you participate in related demonstrations!
Demonstrators took to the Capitol steps Monday in Lansing to sound off on right-to-work legislation that is poised to become law after Gov. Rick Snyder did an abrupt about-face on the issue last week and a series of related bills passed in the House and Senate.
Larger protests are expected Tuesday when the legislation could reach Snyder's desk for his signature. Patch will be live-blogging from Lansing as the situation develops.
[Are you participating in the demonstrations? Leave a comment, upload a photo or e-mail Rochester Patch.]
Read on for a description of each bill and to find out how lawmakers who represent Rochester and Rochester Hills voted.
House Bill 4054
The legislation that would make Michigan a "right-to-work" state was passed 58 to 52 in the House on Dec. 6, according to michiganvotes.org. The bill would prohibit unions from requiring workers to pay dues as a term of employment. It also includes a $1 million appropriation to make it "referendum-proof," michiganvotes.org reports. (Visit legislature.mi.gov to download the full bill.)
- Rep. Tom McMillin, R-Rochester Hills, voted yes.
Senate Bill 116
The legislation that would make Michigan a "right-to-work" state was passed 22 to 16 in the Senate on Dec. 6, according to michiganvotes.org. The bill would prohibit unions from requiring workers to pay dues as a term of employment. It also includes a $1 million appropriation to make it "referendum-proof," michiganvotes.org reports. (Visit legislature.mi.gov to download the full bill.)
- Sen. Jim Marleau, R-Orion, voted yes.
House Bill 4003
The legislation that would extend right-to-work regulations to government and school employees passed 22 to 4 in the Senate on Dec. 6. It passed 63 to 46 in the House on June 8, 2011, according to michiganvotes.org. (Visit legislature.mi.gov to download the full bill.)
- Rep. Tom McMillin, R-Rochester Hills, voted yes.
Ross W. Emerton
3:48 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
I hear you could almost see Dick Devos' lips move while Tom McMillin voted. Still needs more practice, I guess.
Joshua Raymond
3:55 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
Any word if RCS will be in session tomorrow? I understand some districts have already cancelled school because so many teachers will be off.
Kristin Bull
4:14 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
As far as we know, Joshua, school is still in session in Rochester tomorrow.
doug
4:48 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
The fact that a school district like Taylor has to shut down, shows you that somethings wrong with the current environment. President Obama was right about one thing...its all about politics. The unions spend most of their union dues on lobbying. They over-reached in November by trying to bake collective bargaining into the constitution and got creamed by the voters.
Gov Snyder didn't want this battle, but was given no choice when they ignored his advice and pushed proposal 2 anyways. They energized the legislators and now Snyder can't ignore a strong mandate from his own party. Voter polls are also in favor of it.
In some ways this is payback. Its also strategic. The unions proved in November they weren't willing to work in the middle, so now the Republicans will push them back and make them play defense.
Just think if all of these people (on both sides) used all this money and energy for something really productive, what could be accomplished.
Karin Bickle
8:07 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
The middle class doesn't want Right to work for less as law anymore than they wanted it's prohibition in our constitution. Snyder has lost all credibility going along with this barrage of bills including appropriations to stymy the removal of these bills. There has been a lot of plotting to distract the public...and it is still going on. Karin
Scot Beaton
11:17 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
A good read on this subject...
2012 Michigan Economic Competitiveness Study
Executive Brief
Click on PDF at top of article.
MI-Chamber-Execcutive-Summary.pdf
Scot Beaton
11:18 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012
A good read on this subject...
What “Right to Work” Would Mean for Michigan
Roland Zullo, Research Scientist
Institute for Labor and Industrial Relations
University of Michigan
Click on PDF at top of article.
irlee.umich.edu/Publications/Docs/RightToWorkInMichigan.pdf
Daryl Patrishkoff
8:11 am on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
This is about freedom and choice; if the union adds value the employees will join and pay them the fees. If they do not add value the employees will not pay them the fees.
Sounds like a free market, this is what we have to do in business, add value. So what are the unions afraid of? Continually add value to all of their customers, and then they will freely purchase your product and/or service. Why do they need to force them all to pay?
The current situation is a monopoly which is illegal in business. Who is fighting for the workers who do not see value and do not want to fund the union?
Jon Awbrey
11:19 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
This is about freedom and choice; if the government adds value the citizens will join and pay them the taxes. If they do not add value the citizens will not pay them the taxes.
By your logic, taxes should be voluntary, too. Also, paying for something you take out of a store should be completely voluntary, too. After all, it's just human nature that people will always freely pay the actual costs of benefits received.
I'm sure that a Zero-Based Budget & Barter Society is some people's idea of utopia. But anyone who stops to think about it for 30 seconds would realize what a nightmare that would be.
Mike Reno
11:49 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Compulsory is the problem, Jon.
You are forcing people to pay a third party as a condition of employment.
As far as taxes... they are an unfortunate but necessary condition of US residency. You can't see the difference between residency and employment?
Jon Awbrey
4:28 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
I see this as State interference with contracts.
Businesses sign exclusive contracts with each other all the time, and their owners would be outraged if the state interfered with their freedom to do so. I don't see a labor contract as any different from that.
Imagine your company signs a contract with another company that makes your company the exclusive provider of specified goods and services to the other company for a specified fee for a specified time.
Suppose the State passes a law saying that any other individual or company who wants to violate that contract has some kind of “Right To Weasel” into your business any time they feel like it.
Suppose some individual or company does just that, and the company you contracted with decides that your contract is void, because the other source “adds more value” to their bottom line.
Imagine the hue and cry against you when when you protest:
“This is about freedom and choice. If your company adds value the other company will observe the contract pay your fees. If your company does not add value the other company will not pay your fees.”
Mike Reno
5:13 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Still stewing about this?
You make an interesting point, at first glance. But analogy you offer is too simplistic, and you forget that the government does have laws that will interceded... in the case of monopolistic practices. That is really what these labor contracts are.
You seem to think that businesses freely enter into these labor contracts, and that is HUGE stretch. Yes, they do approve them, but what choice do they have? I guess they could chose between signing and closing shop?
You view it as "Right to Weasel"; we view it as "Extortion Abatement"
Mike Reno
5:16 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Oh... and that is just from the business perspective. From the labor perspective, you are still forcing someone to pay a third party for a service that they may or may not want.
If they union is good, employees will welcome their representation.
When was the last time the UAW held a vote to see if people still wanted a union?
Lianne Mathie
9:08 am on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Daryl, you did not just say that did you? monopoly?
Let's talk real monopolies, like Monsanto for instance. I leave that there.
I think it's crystal what side you stand on with this issue, no bones about it.
I ,on the other hand will be watching our state now do a tit for tat dance for some time going forward. Snyder repeatedly said it was " Not on the agenda." , " Too divisive."
I would have preferred it go to a vote of the people. Instead, it's being fast tracked through a lame duck session and it does not look on the up and up. Just pay back for 2. Petty and juvenile and oh so rich coming from the same people that work only 180 days a year, yet collect full time pay, benefits, healthcare and pensions.
doug
9:50 am on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Lianne:
This is a direct result of the democrats trying to push through a sweeping constitutional amendment on collective bargaining, despite warnings from everyone including Snyder that such an attempt would likely result in this.
Not doing this would invite the same Democrats to create proposal 3 or something like it. Such a law would have had a devastating effect on Michigan's future economy. Nobody would want to invest in this state.
As they say, elections have consequences.....
Mike Reno
10:19 am on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Snyder has said all along that it is not on the radar...
But it was not because he did not believe in Freedom to Work. It was because he did not want to unleash the divisiveness that we now see. (For example, 26,000 kids out of school today because those teachers put politics ahead of their responsibilities to teach our kids.)
However, as doug noted, that horse was let out of the barn by organized labor and the dems. They have been waging this divisive battle now for six months. The issue was not going to die with the overwhelming loss in November. So I think Snyder has prudently decided that passing Freedom to Work now will put a cap on it... what's done is done... and we can start off the new year fresh.
And as far as putting it on the fast track... I guess I'm not sure how we can view it that way. This has been discussed for years. It is simple legislation. What more can be said about it that has not been said a thousand times over the years? How many people do not already have established positions on it?
Joshua Raymond
10:53 am on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
I don't think this was on his agenda until Proposal 2 was initiated, but not for the reasons people are mentioning.
Snyder had other laws he was focusing on, such as teacher tenure and evaluations and emergency financial managers. Proposal 2 would have overturned many laws he had worked to have passed. When the unions tried to overturn and prevent the other parts of the agenda, they became much more of a threat to what he was trying to do. Right to work helps to neutralize this threat to the other parts of his agenda. It's similar to the campaign finance reform bills passed by Democrats to reduce the power of Republicans and corporations.
Prior to Proposal 2, the threat to the rest of Snyder's agenda was minor. I don't think Snyder views this as payback for Proposal 2, but protecting the other parts of his agenda that he believes will make Michigan a better state.
Lianne Mathie
11:10 am on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Indeed, this is payback. What is done is done.
Now, please adress the hypocricy of our part time legislature.
Thank you
Mike Reno
2:05 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
When you mention hypocrisy... do you mean when they forced home healthcare workers to join SEIU, and are now saying that it is optional?
Lianne Mathie
10:00 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Back on point to my point. Tit for tat Mike? Please address the actual comment I made.
Lianne Mathie
7:24 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Pending Approval
Lianne Mathie
7:04 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Mike, you are a amazing magician! My hat is off to you. Now, Dear Sir, answer the real question I posed.
I personally voted no on 2 and 4. I have had to pay off unions to leave us alone when we load in our display at trade shows. Over payed to have a light bulb changed in New York at another trade show. I have no great love for unions.
My point being these over fed, over eager, freeloading Reps and Senators in Lansing have not much of a leg to stand on in terms of credibility, by fast tracking a bill that really should have gone before the voters in IMHO.
But that's all good with you. right? ;)
Lianne Mathie
7:25 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
As I was saying, but Patch never posted.
Lianne Mathie
7:04 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Mike, you are a amazing magician! My hat is off to you. Now, Dear Sir, answer the real question I posed.
I personally voted no on 2 and 4. I have had to pay off unions to leave us alone when we load in our display at trade shows. Over payed to have a light bulb changed in New York at another trade show. I have no great love for unions.
My point being these over fed, over eager, freeloading Reps and Senators in Lansing have not much of a leg to stand on in terms of credibility, by fast tracking a bill that really should have gone before the voters in IMHO.
But that's all good with you. right? ;)
Mike Reno
9:30 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Lainne, I am not particularly impressed with our legislature as a whole. Aside from little bursts like this, they have not shown remarkable leadership.
Having said that, I am not sure see their actions here as an epic fail. Refer to my comments to your previous post.
I would've thought it would've been a great opportunity to be more public about it, in an effort to trumpet the positive effects of RTW in the press.
In retrospect, given the violent reaction of the thugs, maybe they made the right decision?
Scot Beaton
12:38 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Lianne...
I wish a coalition of Michigan taxpayers would discuss this idea... sorry Patch readers to go off subject.
Redistrict the State to reduce the the House of Representatives from 110 to 55 full-time members and the Senate from 38 to 18 full-time members. With the goal of reducing the legislative budget by $50,000,000+. Michigan, per capita, has a higher amount of legislators than the national average.
You would think that before our State Legislators tell unions how to govern themselves, they could set an example themselves!
Michigan Legislature... "The Michigan Constitution vests the state’s lawmaking power in a two-house Legislature consisting of a 38-member Senate and a 110-member House of Representatives. The Legislature is an independent branch of state government with the authority to enact laws that regulate and protect the actions and interests of the government and the people. The Governor’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2013 recommends total funding of $127.9 million, of which $120.8 million is general fund. The Governor’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2014 recommends total funding of $128.4 million, of which $121.2 million is general fund."
http://www.michigan.gov/budget
Scot Beaton
12:49 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
"Labor unions have a long history of pursuing legislation that benefits all wage-earners: higher minimum wage laws, universal health care, health and safety protections, to name a few. Union’s leverage to achieve gains in these areas is directly related to their ability to mobilize support during the political cycle. As such, unions operate telephone banks, engage in member education, and canvass communities to inform their members and the public to get out the vote. Under RTW laws we can expect resources for these activities to diminish, resulting in lower voter turnout among the working class and a political system that is less responsive to Michigan’s non-rich. Finally, labor unions are active in civic affairs. As human institutions embedded in our communities, unions frequently organize collections on behalf of the less fortunate, they are among the largest givers to charitable organizations, such as the United Way, and they even occasionally fund popular community activities, such as little league teams. Under RTW, we should expect this role to decline."
Roland Zullo, University of Michigan
Scot Beaton
12:50 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
"Unions are certainly not flawless. They are organizations that breathe a measure of democratic life into an otherwise autocratic corporate culture. And as democracies, unions can embrace the best and the worst of human intentions. On balance though, labor unions have an admirable history. In every capitalist economy, the standards for economic, political and social equity are owed in part to a vibrant, independent union movement. Consider this final thought, fellow citizens, as you contemplate whether Michigan is to become a RTW state."
Roland Zullo, University of Michigan
Mike Reno
1:29 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
This is what (their) democracy looks like:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtbWbw66KrI
"A violent mob destroys the Americans For Prosperity tent on the lawn of the state capital during protest against right to work legislation. While destruction happened, there were people inside the tent and some in the crowd were armed with knives."
The mob eventually slashed the tent.
Meanwhile, inside the capitol:
http://nation.foxnews.com/michigan/2012/12/11/dem-mi-house-floor-says-there-will-be-blood-if-right-work-passes
Michigan State Representative Doug Geiss, D-Taylor promised today on the Michigan house floor that there "will be blood" if right-to-work passes. Geiss was debating legislation that would make Michigan the nation’s 24th right to work state.
Paul Merlo
11:41 am on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
If it's on the intra-webs, then it must be true:
http://www.eclectablog.com/2012/12/breaking-americans-for-prosperity-stages-phony-altercation-at-michigan-right-to-work-rally.html
Scot Beaton
11:56 am on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Paul... great find thanks -- thanks for the post!
Mike Reno
1:34 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Well, if combatant Tom Duckworth says he saw it... and says so on the intra-webs... then I guess everything else we with our own eyes in the dozens of videos must be fabricated.
Who is Tom Duckworth, anyway?
doug
1:57 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
How about a reality check....Unions spend the majority of union dues collected on political suppport. As an example, the MEA spends millions electing school board members who are beholden to them at contract time, which helps them get more in pay and benefits.
If what they do is so admirable, they should have no problem getting workers to contribute through dues....This law does nothing more (or less) than give people the choice to join or not. Sounds like a goal most democrats would support. Choice...
Scot Beaton
4:24 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
doug...
Personally my opinion -- unions 50%-50% -- but the hypocrisy between both sides is disturbing. doug... I took the time to post PDFs -- two well thought out thesis; both sides on this subject... wonder if anyone took the time to read them or the bill -- the bill is only eight pages.
Funny -- how we can forget history... a union brought down Communism in Poland which is now a Democracy.
Funny -- how Republicans can get their underwear in a bunch when government steps in and passes regulation that would regulate a business.
Funny -- how some Republicans don't recognize that unions are also a business and don't want government regulating what they can and can not do? I wonder how business would react if they passed a law that stated I could take lunch anytime I felt like it. :)
This is a done deal; and there is study, after study, after study that RTW states pay less for one's hard work -- same job -- contributing to America's economy. I don't think this is about choice but more about one's control of a business?
note: Someone answer this question, I don't know the facts -- is the UAW in charge of the management of employee benefits? And to manage that... would that not take union dues? And now when one opts out with this new bill will they still be entitled to those benefits but not the management of that cost?
doug
4:47 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Scot: I agree that neither side is being straight about their motives ....
Democrats: Its all about the money and the millions they need to fiund their politcal lobbying efforts. They are afraid that given the choice, workers will opt out, particualrly those who don't support their politcal views.
Republicans: This is payback for the union over-reaching with proposal 2 and supporting Manny on the bridge. They are afraid they will keep trying, based on their past actions and this will set them back for awhile.
You can forget all the rest of the mom and apple pie rationale both sides are offering. The republicans won this one.....
Right to Work as a concept has some merits. It doesnt lower wages. It tends to be enacted in lower wage states as a way of attracting business. The list is dominated be southern states, who are doing better economically with lower unemployment rates and higher growth. Those are just facts that both sides spin the way they want them.
If all unions stepped up to the plate the way that the UAW did with GM and Chrysler, I believe most people would be against RTW. That has not been the case, particularly with the public unions, which is why opinion polls will be behind Snyder on this one....
Lets not forget who started this fight.
Stacia Ford
5:08 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
I know people are trying to make this out to be a one-dimensional choice with a minimal outcome, but the way that "right to work" has played out in different states has not been empowering to unions or middle-class citizens in general. It is not a badge of honor for Michigan to pass this initiative, nor is it a step in the right direction for the economy or morale of the majority of the people in Michigan. No matter how someone feels about right to work, for or against, the way Snyder rammed this initiative through is reprehensible and immoral, not at all consistent with American ideals of fairness, democracy and justice. Snyder is making a conscious choice to be deaf and to not to hear the people's opposition and has made a decision to defy their wishes anyway. This initiative intentionally tries to silence the collective voice of Michigan's common working person, and therefore its middle class. Legislators need to open their eyes and ears and stop tuning out what they don't want to hear or know that doesn't match their personal agenda.
Scot Beaton
6:17 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
doug...
Thanks for your response; I concur neither side is being straight about their motives. And as America continues to take sides in it's mad mad race to the bottom... one would hope we would only just look at the facts.
Fact -- Is it true the rich are getting richer?
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2011/jul/06/it-true-rich-are-getting-richer/
Fact -- The Inflation Rate Is A Lie Too?
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/the-inflation-rate-is-a-lie-too
Fact -- Fiat Currency: Using the Past to See into the Future
http://dailyreckoning.com/fiat-currency/
"Some, myself included, might say that the dollar has already failed. It has lost over 92% of its value since its initial issuance in 1913. After the revaluation in 1934, the dollar dropped another 41%. In my opinion, it already is toilet paper money, but for the above-mentioned characteristics, which are alarmingly similar to the circumstances that led up to the eventual collapse of the dollar’s toilet paper predecessors, I believe that we have seen only the tip of the iceberg of the dollar’s inevitable path toward becoming toilet paper money." -- Nick Jones
P.S. Soon the only difference between Mississippi and Michigan will be the accent... LOL
doug... Happy Holidays
Joshua Raymond
2:25 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
A thank you to the teachers of Rochester Community Schools who were in the classrooms today. We know this issue is important to many of you, but by educating today you demonstrated your professionalism and commitment to the students of this district. We value you and the work you do for our children.
Jon Awbrey
7:38 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
The following information from the National Lawyers Guild : Detroit & Michigan Chapter may help to clear up a number of commonly repeated misconceptions:
“People appear to be critically uninformed about what RIGHT TO WORK laws actually do, as well as what employee rights and duties are with respect to union membership in the status quo.”
See: http://www.facebook.com/michigannlg/posts/476259219084752
Richard Happening
6:20 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Unions are great for something.........................youth hockey. They enable manual laborers and the like to be overpaid so that they can afford things like expensive hockey programs for their kids. That supports the local economy and numerous skating facilities. The hoarse mother (from both smoking and yelling) might not ever be at those games if it weren't for the pay and benefits earned through that hardcore (union) negotiating. Those screaming people in Lansing were truly entertaining. Let's hope that Right to Work doesn't mean the demise of some of our great local rinks. Too much history to lose if they close shop................
Meredith McCutcheon
11:01 am on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Richard, could you clarify for me who you think is overpaid exactly?
UFWC 951SUCKS
7:35 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
I am a member of a union, I personally have no problem with this law passing,...... my problem is with the way it was done. If it was done the way all others bills get passed I would not have a problem with it. Just the way it was ramrodded though is what is bothersome to me.
Bob
12:09 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Where's the thumbs up button
Elizabeth Brower
9:54 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Snyder raised taxes on Pensioners $4,650 per year, and no one, not even Grover Norquist, gave a hoot. Now a larger (i.e., union) constituency gets to feel his right-wing, "Protect only the Wealthy Capitalists" wrath! We got what we voted for, and our only choice comes in the next election!
Richard Happening
10:21 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Elizabeth, anyone earning enough to pay $4650 a year in STATE TAX on their PENSION is wealthy. Please check your math. Paying that much tax to Michigan each year would mean that the taxpayer has PENSION income of more than $100,000/yr. If, and I do mean IF one were able to generate a 5% yield on their investments, they would need more than 2 million dollars in savings to generate $100,000/yr in income. Pensions generally are guaranteed and last a lifetime. Again, someone affected (as you say) by a $4650 tax INCREASE is certainly "wealthy" by most anyone's definition.
Mike Reno
10:29 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Richard... Would that $100K be the adjusted gross? After deductions, like mortgage interest, property taxes, and maybe medical expenses?
doug
10:27 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Taxes were raised on public pensioners who were getting a free pass even though private pensioners were required to pay state taxes ..They also grandfathered it for current retirees.
If that is your argument, you may find the vast majority of citizens who didn't get that special benefit may not be very sympathetic.
In this case, the unions could have avoided this completely.. They elected to push for a constitutional amendment on collective bargaining, even though they were told by everyone what would happen if they lost. The democrats in the state need to take a hard look at their leadership. A lot of bad choices..
Richard Happening
10:36 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Yes Mike- which would make that person even more "wealthy"
Scot Beaton
11:11 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Mike Reno...
I'm 57... so the conclusion from this math is -- WOW
Hefty School Employee Pensions Burden State Taxpayers
At 57, retiree would get $94K a year increasing to $204K a year over time
"When Flint Community Schools Superintendent Linda Thompson made news that she was going to retire, what was missed was the fiscal impact of her leaving the school system. Thompson worked 36 years for the Flint school district and will be 57 when she retires. A public school employee who worked 36 years for Flint schools and made Thompson's average salary of $175,649 the past three years would earn a pension of $94,850 a year. If that 57-year-old retiree received a pension for the 26 years of his or her life expectancy with a 3 percent cost of living annual increase, it would grow to $204,552 a year." -- By Tom Gantert | Nov. 19, 2012 http://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/17959
Mike... what future generation is going to be able to afford that?
Mike Reno
11:36 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Scot... I was tossing what is called a softball... queuing it up for Richard to further drive his point home.
And I can't believe that you read my friend Tom's articles!
Scot Beaton
10:43 am on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Mike... Like you, I like to read a variety of posts on any subject. Jack Lessenberry does an excellent job writing and formulating opinions on issues that affect our Michigan Government too. Like you, and open mind and research should be everyone's goal before making a personal opinion or a policy statement on any issue. To call out anyone's opinion or "ignore the people who act childish, they will eventually give up because they just become meaningless noise and add nothing to the conversation"... we know who wrote that comment is just wrong, and demonstrates that there are those out there who will continue to look at the world with blinders on; which in my opinion is very sad.
Mike... Happy Holidays, thanks for your response I like Tom Gantert too.
Right-wing Power Grab
By Jack Lessenberry Published: December 12, 2012
http://metrotimes.com/columns/right-wing-power-grab-1.1415000
P.S. Tom Gantert and Jack Lessenberry -- lets both agree when looking for a way to formulate a personal opinion we may not have to agree with everything they write but we do enjoy their words, and others as a source for information.
Amy
11:33 pm on Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Look at all the old white men commenting on this issue..all Republican. Old white men, your time is limited. I know you are just grasping for whatever power you have left, but you are now in the minority and changes are coming.
Richard Happening
4:58 am on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Amy, I am not old. But my age or my race or my sex shouldn't matter. I presented cold hard facts and you went straight to areas that are used to determine discrimination under many federal and state laws. Nice job. I would gladly challenge you to a 5-mile race on the trail of your choice and happily post our respective times on Rochester Patch. Should you prevail, I would refrain from any postings for a period of five years.
Georgie Boy
1:52 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Hey, there must be a reason I wake up today and feel like I have been transported back in time to 1983 Leningrad. Too bad I dont have any of my Michigan State sweatshirts and walkmen to sell on the black market. ( too bad I couldnt have been dreaming and actually found myself in 1983 Finland).
This country is on its way to becoming a third world country faster than anyone could imagine. My question is, where will these billion and trillionaires live that will protect them from the toxic air, water, and food they are creating as they demolish our planet at lightning speed. Gated communities can only protect you from so much and militia will only protect you from the angry mobs not disease. We all still have to share this planet and there are some things money can't buy! You can buy a view but you can't maintain that the water you swim in is safe and the air you sunbathe in is breathable.
Greed breeds myopia!
Richard Happening
2:05 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
I need that clean air for my run against Amy. Thanks Georgie Boy!!!!
Georgie Boy
11:49 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
" In these days of changing ways......so called, liberated days.....story comes to mind, a friend of mine......." Rod Stewart 1976.
So, how far have we come since then? And, how much of history would we like to repeat? I personally, would like to skip much of it. As much as I love Elvis, am not really looking forward to reliving the fifties!
And Betsy and Dick Devos are not what I call real 'environmentalists' so may want to rethink the company you keep:)
Georgie Boy
11:52 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Happy Holidays.....always good to get a shout out from you.......keeps both of us on our toes:) ( And on a side note, your friends in Lansing could be a little more polite about their timing. As most of us in the audience on Monday night were NOT so pleased to hear what Dr. M. had to say, despite knowing darn well the content before setting foot in the place. I myself was looking forward to a little break from politics......as there are domestic 'things' to be done before Dec 25th. You see, I dont get paid for my participation in our democracy.)
As always, give my regards to 'Loverboy'. I am always reminded of that 'Loverboy' song 'Paradise' from the movie 'Footloose'. As life in this town sometimes feels like a scene from that movie.
But really, have been listening to a lot of Rod Stewart these days........helps to keep a smile on my face through these tumultuous times! Here......lets sing together, shall we?
"Never Wait or Hesitate......Get in Good before its TOO LATE, you may never get another Chance! Cause Youth's a Mask, but it don't last, LIVE it long and LIVE it FAST,.......... Georgie was a Friend of Mine.....................duh duh duh duh duh duh......duh da duh duh da duh uhhh............................................................................................................Oh Georgie Staaaaaay.......Dont Go awaaaay...... ...........Georgie Please Staaaaay.........You Take OUR Breath Away!"
Amy
3:15 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
I call it as I see it. I'm not afraid to voice what others are thinking and just won't say. I didn't specifically name any names on this, Richard. If you took it personally, that is your choice.
If you think that this issue doesn't involve age, race and income level, then you are misinformed.
History repeats itself. Michigan and many other states are on the brink of entering into class warfare, if we haven't already.
Go ahead and run your race. What a ridiculous proposition. It has nothing to do with my previous statement and I don't feel the need to prove myself to anyone.
Your sensitivity toward my statement is your problem; not mine.
Mike Reno
11:19 am on Thursday, December 13, 2012
Another silver lining out of the cloud from yesterday:
Early today, Clint Tarver, known as "The Hot Dog Guy" here in Lansing had his business attacked by out of line and out of control protesters near the Capitol.
Everyone who has passed the hot dog cart knows what a kind and caring individual Clint is. He never fails to bestow a smile or friendly greeting. In no way he he provoke this attack, nor any of the behavior displayed toward him.
Regardless of your position on current legislation, rebuilding Clint's Hot Dogs is something we can all support. Please give what you can to get this deserving businessman back out there!
(Photo Credit to Nick Hawatmeh via Rob Macomber)
http://www.gofundme.com/SupportClint
Richard Happening
9:07 pm on Wednesday, December 12, 2012
After 7 boxes of Kleenex, I think I am going to make it.