Rochester Bus Driver Arrested For Theft Before Pickup at High School
The school bus the 53-year-old woman was driving was parked outside the Rochester Hills store where she was arrested for retail fraud, police say.
A bus driver for Rochester Community Schools was arrested for retail fraud at the Village of Rochester Hills on Friday afternoon while the school bus she had been driving was parked in the store's parking lot, according to police.
The incident was reported at 2:40 p.m. Friday; according to Rochester Schools officials, the bus driver was scheduled to pick up students at Stoney Creek High School.
The bus driver was a 53-year-old woman, according to a news release from the Oakland County Sheriff's Office; she was arrested and taken to the Oakland County Jail pending an arraignment. The specifics of the retail fraud complaint were not immediately known.
According to the news release, the school district's bus garage was contacted at the time of the driver's arrest to retrieve the school bus from the parking lot. There were no students on the bus when the incident occurred.
Bus drivers for Rochester Schools are contracted employees of Durham School Services, an Illinois-based company that operates more than 17,000 school buses nationwide.
Rochester Schools officials issued the following statement on Sunday night: "We are discussing the issue with Durham and anticipate their response explaining how something of this nature could have occurred and what safeguards they have in place to prevent future incidents."
Last spring, the Rochester Board of Education, under the advisement of former Superintendent Fred Clarke, approved the outsourcing of transportation services, along with custodian and partial ground services, to save the district money. Clarke resigned last week.
The school district's contract with Durham is for three years and is estimated to save the district $4.7 million.
An update on the Durham relationship with Rochester is planned for the Monday night Board of Education meeting.
According to a Q&A on the Durham website, all drivers are required to pass a drug and alcohol screening and a criminal background check. It is not known how long the driver has been a part of the Rochester fleet.
Alan Stamm
7:45 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012
Retail fraud is the legal term for shoplifting (or price-switching or trying to get a fraudulent refund),
Whatever she allegedly tried to pilfer is bad enough, but please let it not be a can or beer or bottle of booze . . . good grief, please.
Jason
9:08 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012
I am just glad there were no kids on the bus that would witness their driver get taken away in handcuffs
Dr. Kendra Nylewsky
9:03 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
I was thoroughly disgusted and appalled when I had read this article. This is a grossly and overly exaggerated account of what had transpired.I hope that whomever it was that thrives on these type of totally unfactual events and the desire to maliciously report them will be required to be held accountable for the damage that this will cause that individual.
Sherry
9:29 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
What exactly did transpire that the article grossly exaggerated?? Was she not actually arrested?? I think most readers would be very curious to have the info clarified.
lynda
9:42 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
The story is true. This was not the first time and it was captured on tape.
Carol Jackson
11:29 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
Speaking of wishing to have the info clarified, yes, I would be interested to hear from Dr. Nylewsky a) what was exaggerated & what happened instead & b) what makes her think her version is the one we should take more seriously than the news account. I would also like to hear from "lynda" a) what happened previously (the alleged shoplifting? the parking the bus to allegedly shoplift?) & on what tape available to whom? If "it" happened before & was caught on tape, why wasn't the driver apprehended then? Stores aren't that nice to shoplifters. Similarly, I would like to hear how she "knows" that her account is correct.
Whatever (if anything) is wrong with this article, it's sourced. The police, school district, & the Durham company's website are all cited. If others know more or know better sources, that's great, but tell us who they are & why we should believe them.
Kristin Bull
12:18 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
Hi, Kendra. If there are inaccuracies in this story or in the information that was included in the police report or in the information we received from the school bus management company, the school district, or the jail inmate release/booking records, please let me know. My contact information is included at the top of the Patch home page.
Marcus Burger
1:52 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
"Dr Kendra", it looks pretty FACTUAL to me... "On Friday, Stacho was arrested by deputies from the sheriff's office at Parisian at The Village of Rochester Hills, where a loss prevention officer observed her attempting to steal $543 in clothing, Johnson said. Her school bus was parked outside the store."
I think that the article was quite neutral and straight forward, considering the fact that this is a second offense. Stacho wouldn't happen to be a friend of yours, would she?
Mike Reno
9:03 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
"under the advisement of former Superintendent Fred Clarke, "
Wonder why this was considered a relevant part of the story?
It was the school board that directed the superintendent and his administrative team to explore the options. It was the third time the board had directed such an exploration; they also happened under Schultz and Pruneau.
And in the end, it was the school board that reviewed the options and made the decisions.
Are we now hoping to cleanse the board... and make Clarke the lone man on the grassy knoll?
Kristin Bull
12:14 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
Concerns heard, Mike. It seemed relevant to me because it was my understanding the school board acted on the recommendation of the administration team. But I can see your point and I appreciate your feedback.
Carol
9:02 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
Are these drivers new to the district or former school employees working for Durham?
Cynthia Rocco
1:52 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
This is a new driver, I had 23 years with the district and I left in May to work for Utica Community Schools due to the outsourcing of the transportation department. I have never seen this woman before. Quite upset, I still have a son using the Rochester Bus system.
Barbara Holder
9:02 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
This is what happens when you outsource a service that is so critical to our cities reputation. People who work for private focus on themselves and the job and do not have empathy or a sense of pride for servicing such a well respected community. That is why you never outsource your critical services such as School Transporation, Fire/EMS services, etc. Now Rochester schools is getting what they pay for. Save that dime and watch the reputation dwindle in time. :(
Richard Happening
6:44 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
The only difference that outsourcing will cause with respect to this incident is the immediate dismissal of this bad person, instead of a protracted battle with an arcane union system. Why in the world is a custodian or a bus driver part of some silly union? Answer: to ensure that they are overpaid and not held accountable for the quality of their work.
Dave D
9:02 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
Lets not just "throw Fred Clarke under the bus" here (sorry - pun intended) - he is not alone in recommending privatization in general, and Durham in particular. The Board was in on this action and actively participated in the vetting of the contractors. Accountability needs to extend to all, not just the fall-guy Mr. Clarke.
Barbara Krueger
9:35 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
What store did this take place?
Jennifer Sanderson
9:43 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
The choice to steal from The Village was a personal one made by that driver, whether they arrived there in their personal vehicle or the company vehicle (the bus), the choice was ignorant and they will be punished. How this reflects back on the board for making a decision to keep the district from going bankrupt is beyond me.
Cynthia Rocco
1:51 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
The district wasn't broke, in fact, they had one of the largest rainy day funds in all of Oakland County. This is what happens when you outsource, our community was promised that this company was going to do complete background checks on the new employees. It's quite clear that didn't happen and for this reason anyone involved in this decision should be held accountable.
Rochester Resident
3:30 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
Are you serious? They made a decision that in turn led to a person with a criminal history driving our kids to school!
Joshua Raymond
12:23 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Cynthia, our fund balance "rainy day fund" is rapidly shrinking. It has decreased by millions over the last couple years. We could not afford to spend at the rate we were any longer. The two largest pools of money to go after were maintenance and transportation or teacher salaries and benefits. The BOE and administration chose maintenance and transportation first. If they don't cut teacher salaries and benefits this year, I don't know where they will get the money.
This employee's background check would have been done prior to her February arrest. She had been with Durham for three years.
Clara T
9:42 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
Rochester School Board Expiration Dates:
Jennifer Berwick, President - Term Expires: December 2016
Beth Talbert, Vice President - Term Expires: December 2018
Chuck Coutteau, Secretary - Term Expires: December 2014
Lisa Nowak, Treasurer - Term Expires: December 2014
Gerald Moore, Trustee - Term Expires: December 2016
Jane Pierobon, Trustee - Term Expires: December 2018
Pat Piskulich, Trustee - Term Expires: December 2018
Lori S
9:52 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
School board meeting tonight at 7 pm!
Chris
11:56 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
I am appalled that Durham hired such a criminal. Sorry, but crime is crime and this lady had a lot of nerve to steal on her way to pick up kids!! With her bus in tow! UGHH!!!!!!
Joshua Raymond
11:56 am on Monday, September 24, 2012
For those going to the BOE meetings, it is always a good idea to read the Board Packet beforehand to find out when you will have a time to speak about an issue. Durham happens to be on the agenda tonight.
See http://media.rochester.k12.mi.us/download/149720?token=OCaRojCyVwc%3d
for the agenda and related material.
Kristin Bull
12:26 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
The bus driver, who has been arraigned on charges of first-degree retail fraud, had a prior arrest. http://patch.com/A-yb0d
We are still awaiting a response from Durham School Services.
Alex Freeman
1:52 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
Reno gets his dream: Outsourcing. Now complains about board malfeasance. How about the legislature reducing per pupil funding? That is why Durham was hired. Thank your bigoted buddy Tom McMillin
Mike Reno
3:30 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
Hardly a "dream". And god forbid that we put more money back in the classroom.
You make a silly point. You don't think this could've happened if it was a direct employee?
http://www.azfamily.com/news/Valley-School-Bus-Driver-Accused-of-Crimes-Against-Children-160633725.html
Rochester has had employees with issues. There was an employee dismissed just a few years ago for inappropriate touching and texting.
This driver's past misdemeanor happened just 4 months ago, and I wonder if the district would've caught it. Even if they do annual background checks (which I believe the union found objectionable), I wonder whether a misdemeanor would've been detected. And even it is was, depending on timing, it could've theoretically gone undetected for up to another 11 months before the next check. So, should we start doing monthly checks? Weekly checks?
I don't think the district would detect whether a teacher was charged with misdemeanor theft.
My point is that this same thing could've happened even if the person worked directly for the district.
We certainly don't want to be cavalier about this, but you need to be realistic.
And this sick obsession you have with Tom... just wow.
Carol Jackson
6:44 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
@Mike Reno: I am not so sure the first arrest would have been undetected if the perpetrator had been an RCS employee. A store in the district might have found a way to notify an employer in the district. Kids from RCS schools may well work at Parisian; parents of RCS students certainly work at Parisian. A concern for privacy rights or something of that nature might keep Parisian from formally notifying an employer all the way in Chicago, but not necessarily informally notifying one in the same town.
That said, I agree with your point about any employer, including RCS, potentially having unforeseen problems with this sort of thing. & shoplifting isn't always something people do who need money. But there is some validity to the concern about the quality of employee a cut-rate employer attracts. As I hope our kids are learning, cost cutting doesn't come from nothing. This issue by itself may not mean so much (except for the issue of why was the driver using a bus on even legal personal business -- is my tax money going to gas up buses for shopping sprees?), but if this is part of a pattern, what solution do you propose then?
RH Mom
1:57 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
Not that I am at the Mall that often (; but I always find it odd when school buses parked in the back lot of Parisian?
Cynthia Rocco
2:34 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
I worked for the district for 23 years, we were never even allowed to be in that parking lot, it was off limits to transportation employees. They also have GPS systems on those buses, how come they didn't know where she was. We were also not allowed to leave for our pm runs until 15 minutes before school let out, how was she able to have time to stop at a mall?
Tim Watkins
3:36 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
Say what you want, this WOULD NOT have happened had administrative greed over taken Rochester Community Schools resulting in privatizing custodial and transportation. It's only a matter of time before harm comes to a student. It has happened in nearby districts, it's only a matter of time before it happens to a student at RCS!! And please don't say they had to privatize to prevent bankruptcy after that huge severance package they gave to the former superintendant!!
Concerned Union Member
5:03 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
Mike Reno’a comment
" This driver's past misdemeanor happened just 4 months ago, and I wonder if the district would've caught it. Even if they do annual background checks (which I believe the union found objectionable), I wonder whether a misdemeanor would've been detected."
Are totally false. The Background checks for School employees are governed by law. If in fact a school employee is charged with a crime they MUST report it to the superintendents office within 24 hrs or be subject to termination. So please Mike don't try to undermine the "Union"as our members follow the law and I know for a fact have reported to the district whenever arrested or charged with any crime, no matter how small. Bottom line private contractors don't fall under the same laws as school employees, school employees are held to a much higher standard.
Concerned Union Member
5:19 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
OMG Mike Reno,
The article you cite did not even happen in Michigan it happened in AZ.
Michigan has laws Mike that School Employees HAVE to follow. You are so anti Union it is unreal.
Mike Reno
6:44 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
OK... would a Michigan story matter?
http://www.woodtv.com/dpp/news/local/gun_lake_region/Hastings-bus-driver-held-on-CSC-charges
http://www.wndu.com/hometop/headlines/111726874.html
Jane Smith
10:15 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
Amen to that.
Concerned Union Member
6:44 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
Portion of PA 129 -131 and 138 2005
This Governs School District Employees in Michigan
· If the employee does not report the charge or conviction, he or she is guilty of an additional crime. If the non-reported charge or conviction is a felony or listed offense, the person is guilty of a felony. If the non-reported charge is a non-listed offense misdemeanor, the person is guilty of a misdemeanor.
· If the employee does not report the charge or conviction, the district may discharge the person from employment or termination of his or her contract, following notice and the opportunity of a hearing.
Mike please know your facts before you post, would be more then happy to debate.
Concerned Union Member
7:12 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012
But Mike the issue you cited was that an employee with a prior convection could have happened in RCS. whereas I'm stating that there are safe guards in Michigan law for public school employers in crime reporting. You state that she was charged 4 months ago. If in fact she would have been an RCS employee she would have had to tell the judge that she was a school employee under the law. Further more she would have had to report it to the superintendents office. Failure to comply with either of the above would result in criminal charges for failure to report punishable by jail time.
Private contractors only have to do pre employment checks.
Mike Reno
8:54 am on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Contractors are subject to the same laws:
Here is a link to the contract, and the relevant provision:
http://media.rochester.k12.mi.us/download/139614?token=OCaRojCyVwc%3d
6.3.1 School District’s Philosophy: It is the School District’s intent to provide high-quality Transportation Services and to ensure the safety and comfort of the School District’s Students. The Contractor hereby recognizes the following examples of safety standards for its personnel.
6.3.1.1 For the protection of Students, the drivers and other persons who have contact with Students and their families shall meet or exceed all certifications and requirements mandated by all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations.
So this would clearly include the laws you cited.
Alex Freeman
7:58 am on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
http://www.wxyz.com/dpp/news/region/macomb_county/12-year-old-mt.-clemens-girl-gives-birth-to-a-baby-and-the-alleged-father-is-a-28-year-old-man
Tom McMillin's Charter School. Janitor impregnated student. Where were the controls?
Cynthia Rocco
8:53 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
How about as a Rochester Hills taxpayers we are funding the gasoline and transportation of Durham's employees criminal acts. Somehow I have a problem with this. Why would Durham employee be exempt from a criminal background check when they gave the current Rochester School employees background checks when they hired with Durham?
Concerned Union Member
2:48 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Mike ,
I see the contract but private contractors aren't charged with additional crimes for not reporting a crime. Therefore not subject to the strict rule of law that school employees are.
Robin
8:53 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
First, i would like to say is that i am a past School bus driver, have been since 1986 til 2004 I also know ALOT of drivers ! And i do know Roseanne Stacho ! Also Durham School Services is a good company, Children ALWAYS come first! I have read comments as ...... safety of children, well as with Durham they hired most drivers back that have already either worked for or another district and its NOT like they just take whoever off the street looking for a job and throw them in a bus to drive children around! Their is ALOT of training to go through to be or become a school bus driver, even after you been driving for years you still have training, classes, dot physical, random drug and alcohol tests! Durham also, does a record check, but to this if a driver does NOT tell their employer, and they run a record check once a year! So, to that its not right to throw blame on Durham School services! They are doing a great job, the ones to be angry at are the school boards from the districts that decide too sell out us bus drivers, custodians, kitchen staff and grounds! that cant seem to manage the money (except in their own pockets) Bottom line is, the best company out there that you would want in your school district is Durham School Services! As, to the School Bus driver....... Roseanne Stacho she is a very caring person and she is a good bus driver, but what she is being accused of was wrong on her part, and even MORE wrong and unfair to others she did this while on the job!!!!
Cynthia Rocco
9:28 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Robin
As stated in past comments, I was a former bus driver for Rochester Community Schools for 23 years. I also am a parent of a student that attends RCS and last but not least I'm a taxpayer in RCS. Last April, the board, the administrators and Durham assured us that the new hires would be put through background checks. If the Rochester School employees had background checks why didn't the Durham employees have background checks?