5 Kids Flip New Car and Crash It Through Rochester Hills Home
The driver of the 2013 Dodge Dart was 16, and police say alcohol was a factor in the crash.
A car full of teenagers riding too fast through a Rochester Hills subdivision crashed into a home on North Fairview shortly after midnight Friday, destroying a garage and wrecking two cars inside, police say.
According to police, all five teenagers walked away from the crash: two collapsed nearby and were taken to area hospitals; the other three teenagers fled the scene, police say.
The accident remains under investigation by the Oakland County Sheriff's Office, though "alcohol appears to be a factor in this crash," sheriff's deputies said in a news release.
No one inside the house was injured.
The incident
Here's what happened, according to information from the sheriff's office and the Rochester Hills Fire Department, which responded to the scene.
At 12:41 a.m. Saturday, a 2013 Dodge Dart driven by a 16-year-old Rochester boy ran into a landscape boulder on North Fairview, west of Grandview and north of Tienken Road. There were four other teenagers inside; at least one was 15.
After hitting the boulder, the car flipped over, crashing into a garage attached to a home on North Fairview.
All of the teens got out of the car and one of them collapsed behind the vehicle at the scene of the accident. The driver collapsed two houses down the street. The three others fled the scene.
The driver was transported to McLaren Hospital in Pontiac, where he was in stable condition, according to the sheriff's office report. The other passenger was taken to Beaumont Hospital in Royal Oak, where he was also in stable condition, the report stated.
At the scene, fire crews from Rochester and Rochester Hills used shoring to stabilize the garage to prevent it from collapsing while the car was removed, said Rochester Hills Fire Chief Ron Crowell.
The homeowner told WWJ-AM (950) that the crash "sounded like an explosion and the whole house moved. It felt like it was an earthquake," she said in this report on CBSLocal.com.
In the state of Michigan, first-year drivers under age 18 are not allowed to have more than one passenger in the car who is a minor unless accompanied by a parent or guardian, except when driving to school.
Also, except for going to work, first-year drivers under age 18 are not allowed to drive between 10 p.m. and 5 a.m. every day.
Dave Mulford
11:11 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012
This is a good example of bad decisions.
jill lutz
11:11 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012
Where is parental supervision and responsibility?
Jeff Smith
11:11 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012
Glad everyone survived - this could have been much worse. My question is: since this was a 2013 Dodge Dart and is not in general release, was this a company car?
Marty Rosalik
7:15 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012
Jeff, better than 50% chance it is a company car. I can't tell if it is R/T option or not. If it was the much more limited model, 100%. That said, a parent may be out of a job Monday morning. Hard lessons for all.
ashu16
7:15 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012
Had to have been since you can't get them yet.....glad nobody was hurt. I feel bad for the parent who has to explain this to their boss why the pre-release stick shift only Dart was totaled. Probably the first totaled Dart.
Mackey Chandler
11:11 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012
You know that Volkswagon ad where the kid says his dad is going to kill him because he dinged the fender? Got nothing on this ad if Dodge wants to copy it.
Michele Manhire
1:18 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012
Disgust. This is all I can muster. Just SIXTEEN? AFTER curfew? Too MANY passengers? DRINKING????? And then add on the fact that the car HAD to have been a company car, which the child shouldn't have been driving anyway. Geeze-louise -- no wonder the kids had such poor judgement, with that kind of parenting as an example. Just how negligent can parents be? Well, THIS shows you. I love the tie in with the VW commercial mentioned above... except this better not just be a case of, "I'm just glad you're OK son." malarkey. This child, and his parents, had better be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law. "Poor judgement" doesn't even come close to covering this one. Thank heavens no one was killed... especially the innocent people sitting in their house! Unbelievable...
Patricia
7:15 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012
I agree...... UNBELIEVABLE!
Stoney Creek Parent
2:15 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012
In the interest of putting correct information out there (I am in NO WAY defending the actions of these kids - their actions disgust me), unless the rules changed in the 9 months since my almost-18-year old got her license, the curfew hours and limit on passengers is only until a new driver reaches 17 years of age, or has had 6 months of restricted driving, which ever comes last. Also, the only rules that change for school and school activities to my knowledge are the times, not the amount of passengers. Just because a 16 year old is driving to school doesn't mean they can have more than one passenger that is not part of teir immediate family (another key part of the restriction - you can have 5 minors in the car but if 4 of them are your siblings, you are not breaking the rules.)
I can't say I am surprised by this story, having a child that just graduated from Stoney and another who will be a junior, I am often amazed at how little supervision some of their "friends" get, how often other parents provide alcohol to their children and their friends and how often kids they know are left alone for an entire weekend to do as they please while their parents travel. My oldest recently told me that the mother of a girl she knows, whose house she has been to a few times, actually does shots with her daughter and her friends in her home. So I guess that is where the parents are at.
Mark
7:15 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012
16 years old, drinking and driving a car that hasnt been released to the general public.... What kind of people are employed by Chrysler !!!!!!!!! It's good to see that Chrysler built a fine car, that saved the lives of those 5 underage students......
Marty Rosalik
8:39 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012
Mark, there is no way to know yet if the parent even knew the kid took the car. It would not be the first time... trust me I know.
Christopher
10:24 am on Monday, June 25, 2012
Marty has touched on exactly what the parents will say. "Alright son, you're already in a ton of trouble, and one way start making it up to your mother and I is to say that you took the car without my permission."
Mark
7:15 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012
Stoney Creek parent, your absolutely right!!!! The 16 yr old shouldn't of have driven a car at 1am in the morning, and what makes this worst, the underage drinking child was driving a company car..... Makes me wonder of the child should of been driving the car.....
Tom Davenport
7:15 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012
Having lived on Grandview for 23 years and making many presentations to the various city officials about the speeding issues on Grandview, we dodged another one. The speed limit is 25 and speed has been measured at over 70. We need speed humps now and stop signs at every intersection second and then aggressive enforcement 3rd. At my presentations to the city officials I was always asked if there had been anyone injured!!!! Must we kill someone to take some action????
AEVANS
1:40 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
where does it say they were going 70???
LS
8:32 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Tom, i would love to talk. I live on N. Fairview in Pine Hill and have called the city a ton. There is also a handicapped child in area sign up on N. Fairview between Barneswood and Tiverton, I guess people just don't care. I am sick and tired of this nonsense.
laurie puscas
9:43 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012
These kids were obviously wrong in being out late, too many people in car and of all things drinking, and of course you wonder where the parents were that allowed this to happen, However, I also wonder about the liablility of those who put large landscape boulders in the easement or rightaway which can most certainly cause a vehicle to flip. I don't know if this was the case her, but the article does mention large landscape boulder. I believe the city is ultimately responsible for what is placed in these areas. I would be interested to hear more on this. Seems that some people at corners or areas where motorists can slide on ice and possibly slide, it would be very dangerous to have boulders placed there where a slight slip could turn into much more and cause injury.
Michele Manhire
11:12 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012
So, let me try to understand your concern... are you saying you would rather have precariously driving people go careening into a house, potentially hurting the innocent residents, than be slowed down and injure themselves on an item 'placed in the way' that might cause them to roll over?? Boy, I hope I misunderstood that, cuz that's some messed up logic. No one driving a posted residential speed limit under normal weather conditions, nor appropriate much-slower speeds in icy weather conditions, need ever be concerned about such impediments. Seriously??
Marty Rosalik
9:22 am on Monday, June 25, 2012
Laurie, look closely at one of the photos. There is a wheel and partial suspension system laying at least 2 to 3 car lengths from the final resting place of the crash. The force to sever that wheel was a significant amount of energy dissapation. It slowed the vehicle and changed the direction of the energy left. 1/2 mV^2. At the point where the vehicle left the road it was a kinetic missile. The multiple moveable objects that the vehicle hit including landscaping significantly increased the stopping distance and spread out the force to stop that missile. The damage to the home and the cars inside the garage provided critical "crush zones". All of that saved those kids lives! Further that landscaping probably kept that vehicle from injuring home occupants. Easments in subdivisions are usually about 20 feet. Not much when you get out a tape measure. Landscaping put in the easment can be dug up to repair water pipes etc, without compensating the homeowner. So most people aware of their easment don't place expensive stuff there.
Christopher
10:24 am on Monday, June 25, 2012
This has to be the post of someone who knows the family of the driver looking to help them seem less like the worst parents in Oakland County.
f.b.
7:25 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Before I let you take an issue about reckless driving and divert others attention to a lawn boulder. You need to address the issue of reckless driving in that subdivison and work on getting a 4 way stop sign and other traffice enforcement in the area. Talk to the people who live there to see what the real safety issues are. How about a traffic study of the subdivision? It is persons like yourself who enable the public to not take resposibility for their actions. Most homeowners would like others to just respect their property and safeguard their homes and children. It stands to reason that the responsibility falls squarely on the driver of the car, the occupants and the parents whose responsibility is to oversee driving minors. There are too many people who for political gain and media exposure intend to divert the issues of reckless driving vs. a lawn rock.. 70 mph... is far to extreme to consider it slight slip off the road. If anything the rocks buffered the full force of the car ramming a house that is usually filled with sleeping children f.b.
bn
7:25 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
So it seems we need more landscape boulders to slow down out-of-control cars and protect our homes.
Frank D.
9:57 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012
I agree with the speed bumps..( you will not see any speeding at Powderhorn Ridge Rd between Adams and Brewster, these speed humps do the job...) . Stop sign they ignore anyway.. There is a stop sign for the N.Fairview traffic at Grandview.. These guys ignored that one as well at very high speed.. You can see how much damage that boulder even got.. All our streets in that area are full of speeders.... Just walk your dogis not safe anymore..... (and by the way.. school busses are included..) Nobody seems to know what 25 MPH is anymore.. I am starting to record license plates and call them in..
Frank D.
10:06 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012
Re-post (some typo errors)
I agree with the speed humps..( you will not see any speeding at Powderhorn Ridge Rd between Adams and Brewster, these speed humps do the job...) . Stop signs they ignore anyway.. There is a stop sign for the N.Fairview traffic at Grandview.. These guys ignored that one as well at very high speed.. You can see how much damage that boulder even got.. All our streets in that area are full of speeders.... Just walking your dog is not safe anymore..... (and by the way.. school busses are included..) Nobody seems to know what 25 MPH is anymore.. I am starting to record license plates and call them in..
uknowimright
7:26 am on Monday, June 25, 2012
That's why your kid's first car is always a junker. Of the other parents I've met over the years, the ones whose kids got the brand-spanking-new vehicles were the ones who were so spoiled that they ended up either injured, dead, or with a totalled car. When you're kid is driving an older model car that is only good for tooling between home, school, and work, and can't go much over 50mph, it prevents a lot of this nonsense. Worked on all of my kids, nieces, and nephews! Make them earn that shiny new rid, folks. It's a good learning tool.
Christopher
10:24 am on Monday, June 25, 2012
I agree, I'm looking for a car that's big and slow, but not roomy enough for inappropriate activities, and then I'll put one of those Progressive trackers on it.
Edie
9:22 am on Monday, June 25, 2012
Spoiled rich kid and entitlement...hope all those kids learned a lesson
Cantbelieveit
10:24 am on Monday, June 25, 2012
On the news this morning I heard the driver isn't giving up the names of the other kids. A shame.
Anonymous13
7:42 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Mistakes were made and people have learned. These kids are my friends and you people have no right to judge them. They made a huge mistake but haven't we all? You're telling me you never drank at our age? And you're kids probably aren't as innocent as you think- were all experimenting and trying to find means of entertaining ourselves; though when something like this happens we learn from it and realize changes must be made in our lives. I love these people and I'm just happy all my friends are alive and well.
Michele Manhire
8:36 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
As a matter of fact, no, we "all" haven't made huge mistakes. Some, perhaps many, have chosen to live a life of responsibility and respect for life - ours and others. Many of us found other less destructive ways to "entertain" ourselves at your age. We're still alive (I'm 47), still having responsible fun, and seeking to raise responsible, socially conscious children. I'm sorry you feel we're being unfair to your friends... I'm pretty certain our reactions are based much more on a comment to society right now and how lacking-in-personal-restraint it seems to be, rather than directly at your friends. Perhaps you and your friends could use this situation as a wake up call to a better lifestyle; one in which you seek out entertainment which won't threaten the life of yourselves, or more importantly, others.
Mentor12
8:36 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
There wont be a next time for you to learn from........ Next time might cost you your life or the life of an innocent human being. Stop being selfish and think if you could live with the though of killing someone else........ I didnt think so.
Peter Griffin
3:46 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
get some new friends --- your "friend" has to be the most irresponsible driver on the road. His "mistake" could have cost someone their life. His "mistake" ruined someone's home. Your friend is a loser and deserves everything he gets. And, by the way, "ALL kids are not experimenting and trying to entertain themselves". I know what my kids are up to and they know the consequence for violating that trust.
Marty Rosalik
8:36 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Anonymous, point made. Your friends got lucky. Not going to get any sympathy on the under age drinking and going that fast in a neighborhood. I lost one of my best friends since Kindergarden while attending Adams High in the 70s. He and several others skipped a school assembly and were doing the same thing for "entertainment", drinking and speeding. The driver lost control out on a hilly twisting and turning section of Silverbell. As the car was rolling over, my friend without seat belt was partially out of the car.
The car hit a 3 foot diameter willow tree RIPPING him in half! Yes "we" did stupid things too. Some of "us" died!
Debbie
11:10 am on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
I heard the sirens - they just kept going. I knew it wasn't far from my home. I prayed for the emergency caregivers and those who needed the help. I hope both young people and parents realize we all have a responsibility for the safety of others and ourselves. There are lessons here for all of us. I'm glad no one was seriously hurt. And for the homeowners - I'm sure it was the LAST thing they ever thought would happen. I'm sorry for the homeowners as well.
Lee Zendel
1:40 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
I notice that a few of the posts called for more traffic enforcement. Well, folks more traffic enforcement takes more deputies but the citizens of this community time after time turn down the new millages to pay for them. There still is no free lunch- you want more enforcement vote yess the next time an additional police millage is on the ballot
jose brando
1:40 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Why is everyone on here acting like this is the first time teenagers have snuck out at night and taken their parents car? I see people blaming Chrysler and landscaping boulders, but let's just leave this at what it is: teenagers being teenagers who made a bad decision.
If the 80's movie "License to Drive" with Corey Feldman and Corey Haim taught us anything, it's that a night out on the town in your parents' stolen car can be both hilarious and a lesson-learning opportunity.
Mentor12
1:40 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Donna, the whole family cannot test drive the vehicle if it's an M plate. Get your facts straight.
Marty Rosalik
3:10 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
"M" plates have strict State and Federal guidelines. As such I am prohibited from even allowing my wife to drive mine. I simply threw outthe possibility that this was a corporate owned vehicle. I have yet to see or hear proof that it was. I stand by my "lucky" statement. I hope that everyone involved learned from this! Bushes, rocks, cars, and garages can be fixed.
Peter Griffin
3:46 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
This homeowner shouldn't have to fix his garage, landscaping or rock -- plain and simple, this homeowner didn't ask for some moronic kid to destroy his stuff.
Anonymous13
1:40 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Be thankful everyone survived and have a future, don't recall the mistakes and dwell on their past.
Peter Griffin
3:49 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
YES --- recall that "mistake" over and over again and make him pay for it over and over again. Anonymous "13" --- get some new friends.
Jeff Smith
3:46 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
But their mistakes are the point - and the mistakes of the parents and their lack of supervision.
Mentor12
4:46 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
I get the impression that "Anonymous13" was one of the three who fled the scene and left his "friends" behind.
Anonymous13
7:30 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
No I'm just really great friends with most of the people involved in this crash and some serious consequences resulted and they are paying for what they have done, but isn't it sad that people aren't even remotely concerned the kids are okay and alive? You people are the reason our society is so messed up. Heartlesssssssss
Peter Griffin
9:41 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Anonymous "13" sounds like some 13 year old teenager that thinks they have all the answers to life's questions (kind of adorable). I guess that is why the US has 13 year old Presidents. "13", get some smarter friends.
LS
8:32 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012
As I type I can hear people "flying" down my street, N. Fairview Lane. This is a constant problem. Lee, I always vote yes regarding police millage and I for one have called the city at least twenty times about this problem. We need speed humps on N. Fairview from E. Fairview to Grandview. It might not solve all of the problems, but it sure will hekp. This is the second house in this subdivison to be hit, maybe somebody will listen now. We heard the car coming doen the road that night, it was UNBELIEVABLE !
mamamac
9:41 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Mentor12....you made me laugh. If you have all the info then please share. We assumed it is a test car, but Marty, who seems to be the voice of reason is right, we just don't know. No matter what, those kids messed up but I am glad they survived.
LS…I lived on a street like that once and hated it. I do hope the powers that be take notice and do something for your neighborhood.
John McMillin
9:41 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Since 2009 there have been three major incidents in North Fairview Farms not counting the mail boxes and damaged parked cars on the streets and also the many lawns that have been drove over. As far as I know mine was the first one where a driver decided to run from the officer that pulled him over for impaired driving. His sped was estimated at over 100 mph when he lost control, took out three mail boxes, side swiped my neighbors tree and then broadsided the first tree he came to in my yard. The second one was on N. Fairview and Tiverton where the car went through the stop at Tiverton (which ends at N. Fairview and went into the house on the other side. Now this one involving a garage and teenagers. All three of these had stop signs involved in which the drivers ignored. Speed humps do need to be placed in our subdivision on N. Fairview and Grandview at least due to the length that these roads are. We also need to block the road off going to the subdivision to the east of us because I have clocked some of those drivers doing over 40 m.p.h. on our streets.
John McMillin
9:41 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Did not know that I was limited to how much I could put in here. Continued, speed humps cost money and the state and city will not be giving us any for this type of improvement to our subdivision. Last I knew, the state surveys how many fatalities in a period of time at a intersection to install a traffic control device. So if we want speed humps in our subdivision, open up the pocketbooks and I am sure that the association would take action. Since we have no sidewalks, we use the streets to get around by car, bike, and walking and the last two are really not to safe anymore. As for the three incidents in my comment, they where all bad decisions on the drivers part and I am sure that we will have more bad decisions by some. Let us hope that those will not end up in loss of life or injury.
Big 3
9:41 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
I was in high school just a few years ago (2010 grad). I can vividly remember being 16 and wanting to try new things. But the first rule (and by first, I mean usually the only rule) was you never ever even thought about drunk driving. Anonymous13, nothing you say about 'experimenting' or 'finding entertainment' is the least bit justifiable when it comes to partying and then getting behind the wheel. Glad your friends are ok, but they will learn a lesson in one of the hardest ways possible.
On another note...This was a white Dodge Dart, which is not a production vehicle yet, since only the Red ones have been built in the actual assembly plant. No employee in their right mind would let their son or daughter take out a test vehicle by themselves. It is against the law to have a child driving an M plate automobile UNLESS the employee themself is in the passenger seat...and the employee is held completely liable for any damages.
In conclusion, you don't become an employee of the Big 3 and allow your kid to take the car out. A 16 year old thought it would be cool to take out his dad's COMPANY performance evaluation vehicle (clear lack of respect to authority as well as risking the longevity of the family's financial means), and ending up crashing into a house. Just makes me sick since this stuff keeps happening in Rochester, a notably affluent area. Entitlement seems to lead to this behavior.
JEN JEN
8:17 am on Monday, July 16, 2012
I build these cars where I live. I work for chrysler and build the dodge dart. It is an awesome car. Its sad that alot of these big wigs children feel so entitled. Im would have to imagine that his/her parents did not know they took the car. If they did shame on them. On a more positive note from the pictures i have seen looks like a strong well built american ride to go through the damage it did and for the kids to just walk away. Unbeleivable
mamamac
11:08 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Big 3....thank you for the informative post!
Don Wyatt
11:48 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Thanks to everyone for the great conversation around this sad news event. Is there anything else you want to know about it that we can chase? For parents on the thread, how are you talking to your children about the crash? For students on the thread, how are you and your peers talking about it?
Mentor12
1:37 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Still haven't disclosed names of driver or parent involved.......
John McMillin
1:37 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
My older son is a driver education instructor and he will be using this article in his class as to how not to get into trouble. Wow Big 3, this parent who had the car better hope that his son took it without permission. My younger son has yet to do his level two instruction and knows that drinking and driving do not mix. He has yet to have any alcohol and does not intend on it.
Kristin Bull
1:43 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012
About the traffic/speeding/careless driving issues on North Fairview and on Grandview: We talked this morning with Paul Shumejko, the traffic engineer for the city of Rochester Hills. Paul said he and his staff are aware of residents' concerns and have been studying traffic in these subdivisions for the past several years.
In order for "speed humps" to be installed on a city street, the residents or subdivision association would need to approach the city about this — and offer up the funds to pay for it. A project like speed humps usually would take a calendar year to complete and the city would often try to coincide the installation of the speed humps around another construction project in the city to get a better rate.
Would speed humps have prevented this accident? Hard to say. But since some of the commenters brought these issues up, it made sense to ask.
LS
12:26 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012
I have talked to Paul, also. The problem with subdivisions paying for the speed humps is that many residents that live on interior streets do not want and will not vote yes to pay for them. Also, N. Fairview runs through several subdivisons and if one association will pay and the other will not then they will not install the speed humps. As far as saying would it prevent the accident, well maybe not, but it would have slowed them down some more. Anyone that even wants to secualte on that should come over here for a few evenings and see what it is like on this street.
LS
12:26 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012
I meant speculate, sorry for the typo. At this point and with all of the problems we have had on this street I feel, as do many, that the city needs to do something. This is a matter of safety and it involves several subdivisions.
LMJ19
1:31 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
I have a question......How on earth would you punish your child/children for this act?
Christopher
4:52 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012
Make the take responsibility.
Financial - In the short term insurance is gonna pay for most of this, but I think over time the driver has to pay restitution. No sports, clubs or hobbies. Get a job, any job, and work it off.
Legal - Work with the prosecutor and enter a plea of guilty to an appropriate charge. None of this "I had a rough childhood so I deserve a break". And give up the names of everyone in the car, and where you got the booze or drugs.
Personal - Apologize to Chrysler, your parents, the passengers and their parents, and the home owner.
uknowimright
3:46 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
No, kids, not every teenager made some "huge mistake" as you say. My dad bought me an old clunker with 200k miles on it, wouldn't let me work until I graduated from high school, and wasn't allowed to get my actual licence until I was over 18 (insurance was cheaper,lol.) I didn't have my first beer until I was in college, and didn't go partying all night when I was still in high school. If I had done what you're so-called "friends" had, my dad, a strict military man, would have called the cops on me himself!
Shame on you!
Peter Griffin
9:11 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
How are "they" paying for what has been done when the sissy that caused the wreck was too scared to give the names of the others that were in the car. Is the little lush at least paying the homeowner's insurance deductible? Is the alcoholic paying for the company car that was wrecked?
Do I care if the kids are ok and alive --- not really. Am I heartless --- yes, a bit. I have no tolerance or acceptance for moronic behavior. There are no such things as accidents --- it all boils down to mechanical failure or NOT PAYING ATTENTION. I think this worthless piece of carbon was NOT PAYING ATTENTION to ANYTHING!!